|
Post by Ozymandias on Aug 19, 2019 19:08:51 GMT
Those are some cockamamie stats, the position is about equal.
e5
|
|
|
Post by Vytron on Aug 20, 2019 22:56:27 GMT
Yeah, it's an opening favored by black to crunch much weaker human players. Uh oh.
1. d4 Nf6 2. Bf4 g6 3. c4 Bg7 4. Nc3 O-O 5. e4 d6 6. Nf3 Nbd7 7. Be3 e5 8. Be2
|
|
|
Post by Ozymandias on Aug 22, 2019 22:35:33 GMT
exd4
|
|
|
Post by Vytron on Aug 23, 2019 19:33:55 GMT
1. d4 Nf6 2. Bf4 g6 3. c4 Bg7 4. Nc3 O-O 5. e4 d6 6. Nf3 Nbd7 7. Be3 e5 8. Be2 exd4 9. Nxd4
|
|
|
Post by Ozymandias on Aug 25, 2019 18:37:20 GMT
Re8
|
|
|
Post by Vytron on Aug 27, 2019 3:56:16 GMT
1. d4 Nf6 2. Bf4 g6 3. c4 Bg7 4. Nc3 O-O 5. e4 d6 6. Nf3 Nbd7 7. Be3 e5 8. Be2 exd4 9. Nxd4 Re8 10. Qc2
|
|
|
Post by Ozymandias on Aug 28, 2019 10:12:39 GMT
Qe7
|
|
|
Post by Vytron on Aug 29, 2019 10:14:06 GMT
1. d4 Nf6 2. Bf4 g6 3. c4 Bg7 4. Nc3 O-O 5. e4 d6 6. Nf3 Nbd7 7. Be3 e5 8. Be2 exd4 9. Nxd4 Re8 10. Qc2 Qe7 11. Rd1
|
|
|
Post by Ozymandias on Aug 31, 2019 10:08:14 GMT
Nb6
|
|
|
Post by Vytron on Sept 1, 2019 1:51:41 GMT
1. d4 Nf6 2. Bf4 g6 3. c4 Bg7 4. Nc3 O-O 5. e4 d6 6. Nf3 Nbd7 7. Be3 e5 8. Be2 exd4 9. Nxd4 Re8 10. Qc2 Qe7 11. Rd1 Nb6 12. Ndb5
|
|
|
Post by Ozymandias on Sept 1, 2019 10:47:41 GMT
Ng4
Now that we're in September, I can finally use the engines and play faster. Also. having a chance to analyse the position, I can say this is YABD (Yet Another Boring Draw).
|
|
|
Post by Vytron on Sept 2, 2019 3:58:13 GMT
Do you think I could have played better? I only saw variations where you could have equalized earlier. I guess this was it for 2.Bf4...
13. Bxb6 {Draw Offer.}
|
|
|
Post by Ozymandias on Sept 2, 2019 18:56:40 GMT
Don't fret, everything's a draw, remember? Like this one, which is coherently accepted.
|
|
|
Post by Vytron on Sept 3, 2019 8:36:35 GMT
Do you remember this? You said you think you could beat any player, because we're no different. Do you maintain that you could beat me? And if so, how many games do you think it could take? I'd believe you, but I'd still like to see how it'd happen...
|
|
|
Post by Ozymandias on Sept 3, 2019 15:19:26 GMT
You already brought that up after finishing the first game, so I'd compel you to find my previous reply.
BTW, saying you could do something does not equal doing it always. As for statistics, in the few post on this board, you'll find a summary of my games at correspondence chess. You'd only need add a tour I played at LSS and that's all I can say about probabilities. Just remember I'm not talking about anyone at the top, and anyone who uses engines correctly (including having an appropriate book) is at the top nowadays. I seem to remember having said this too, I hate to repeat myself.
|
|