|
Post by matejst on Dec 30, 2022 16:20:10 GMT
Also: a very interesting site, here.
|
|
|
Post by Ozymandias on Dec 30, 2022 17:35:56 GMT
There was a free version back then, no adds, maybe they changed that bit, but it's worth a try.
|
|
|
Post by Ozymandias on Dec 30, 2022 17:43:38 GMT
Also: a very interesting site, here. Americans in general aren't very adept at this game, but the biggest geniuses are Fischer and Morphy. Pillsbury could have been there too, but he was too sickly and died young. Strange.
|
|
|
Post by matejst on Dec 30, 2022 18:07:42 GMT
The article about Morphy is surprising. So, it seems that he never stopped playing chess after all.
|
|
|
Post by matejst on Dec 30, 2022 18:36:48 GMT
Edward Winter wrote several spurious articles about Dimitrije Bjelica on his Chess history site, and, when he writes about the publishing practices of Bjelica, he is right. Bjelica allows himself a little too much freedom in his borrowings and in his forgetfulness of sources. But he forgets to mention what makes the value of Bjelica's writings: Bjelica never, never misquoted any of the players he interviewed. He also never revealed anything that was said to him privately, and he never wrote gossips. It can be misleading, in the way. One would never imagine that Misha Tal was heavily drinking reading Bjelica's books, nor the role of Petrosian's wife in his career. But, to be honest: it is none of our business. I confess that I eagerly read Gena Sosonko's books, which are just that: gossip, interesting gossip, but gossip all the same. And completely incomprehensible to anyone who hasn't lived in a communist country. They are also skewed -- which is in the order of things -- by the baseness of the expatriate Sosonko, who downplays Keres' Nazi past, for example, and licks Western asses a little too eagerly.
The Fischer from Bjelica is authentic. Bjelica does not say everything, but what he reveals to us, at least, is true. And far from the West, Bobby, even in its political stances, sounds more like a genius than a fool.
|
|
|
Post by Ozymandias on Dec 30, 2022 18:49:32 GMT
The article about Morphy is surprising. So, it seems that he never stopped playing chess after all. Never saw that! It looks like Southern Unionists were the Russians of the time.
|
|
|
Post by matejst on Dec 30, 2022 19:04:04 GMT
Just to post it here, since it is somehow hidden on the original site:
|
|
|
Post by matejst on Dec 30, 2022 19:25:57 GMT
— New Orleans correspondent of the New York Sun. The Sun of the 24th instant contains a repetition of that off-told lie about the insanity of Paul Morphy— that he has not played chess for a long time, and so forth, ad nauseam. Will you have the kindness to publish the following, which contains all the facts concerning Paul Morphy with which the public have anything to do? He is now practicing law in this city; and has never been insane, or spoke of in that relation by his family or friends. As to chess, he is unquestionably to-day the best chess player in the world, although he does not play often enough to keep himself in thorough practice. He gives the odds of a knight to our strongest players, and is seldom beaten, perhaps never when he cares to win. His disappearance from public view as a chess player has just this explanation—no more, no less. “The publicity and lionizing which attached to him for a time, both in this country and Europe, were always distasteful to his family, and especially so to his mother. On his return from his European triumphs, he entered into an engagement with his mother never again to play for a money or other stake; never to play a public game or a game in a public place, and never again to encourage or countenance any publication of any sort whatever in connection with his name. This last clause in the agreement has been so strictly construed as to prevent any denial by him or his family of the numerous silly publications that have been made concerning him. It is now time, however, that the thing should be stopped.”
|
|
|
Post by Ozymandias on Dec 30, 2022 19:46:47 GMT
Which was it? Fear of enemies or fear of his mother?
|
|
|
Post by matejst on Jan 1, 2023 23:01:29 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Ozymandias on Jan 2, 2023 7:47:16 GMT
I like his definition of science, that's why I like it, not because it reflects the truth, but because it's the best practical approach be have. The problem starts when scientist are bought in order to lie, but that's not a problem with science, but with people.
|
|
|
Post by matejst on Jan 2, 2023 12:27:15 GMT
I like his definition of science, that's why I like it, not because it reflects the truth, but because it's the best practical approach be have. The problem starts when scientist are bought in order to lie, but that's not a problem with science, but with people. He sometimes seems to have problems will the difference between correlation and causality (makes me think of the well-known example of drownings and ice creams), but for a player who was perhaps the best writer of his generation and certainly the most educated, who had continuously good results at tournaments for a decade, one bad year, one long article in NIC, and he was not invited to RR top tournaments any more. He was 35 years then, probably at the height of his strength.
What does he do now? He lives in Spain. Do you happen to know?
|
|
|
Post by Ozymandias on Jan 2, 2023 13:40:45 GMT
No idea, supposedly he still lives close to Madrid and works at "universities", he also gave some course for blind people.
|
|
|
Post by matejst on Jan 3, 2023 11:49:01 GMT
No idea, supposedly he still lives close to Madrid and works at "universities", he also gave some course for blind people. Just curiosity, but he should earn enough for a comfortable life. As a chess player with an Elo over 2600, he could make 20k euros per year just playing for clubs in the Bundesliga, in France, Spain, Croatia... plus money from teaching chess.
Anyway, I visited the forum shekhina. On a page, the admin mentioned Michael Hoffman. Hopefully, I read one of his books, but I have forgotten most of it, the central thesis excepted, which I internalized. I forgotten so many good books, always being in hurry to learn more, to understand deeper.
There isn't time enough, Ozy. My friends are falling like flies -- leukemia, cancer, heart attacks -- mostly those who have never drank, smoked, who were in good shape.
|
|
|
Post by matejst on Jan 3, 2023 12:49:54 GMT
Still losing precious time navigating through Salov's fora posts.
Most people accept or reject "en block", as a whole. I try to think about a theory and to filter separate data. Is there anything valuable in Salov's writings? What's obviously wrong, what's obviously right?
Is it important enough to read it, to devote time to his theories?
I still don't know.
|
|